- 84 - taxpayer’s brief found tantamount to concession), affd. 125 F.2d 467 (7th Cir. 1942); Water Resource Control v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1991-104 (statements at trial and on opening brief deemed concession of interest deductions claimed on returns), affd. without published opinion sub nom. Whitehouse v. Commissioner, 972 F.2d 1328 (2d Cir. 1992). Nothing in the record contradicts that concession. Accordingly, we hold that no adjustment is required in Sylvia’s source and application of funds analysis for gambling expenditures. 6. Additional Items Identified as in Dispute The parties have identified the following items through joint finding of fact No. 4 as items to which they do not agree. a. Withholding on Gambling Winnings In the source and application of funds analysis for Sylvia for 1988, see infra Appendix G, respondent included as an application of funds $345 for estimated withholding on gambling winnings. Petitioners do not explain why they disagree with that item. In the source and application of funds analysis for 1988, respondent credited Sylvia with $38,550 in winnings from gambling activities on December 23, 1988. Petitioners do not disagree with that item. We conclude that an estimated $345 withholding at source is reasonable considering the amount of Sylvia’s gambling winnings on December 23, 1988; accordingly, we hold thatPage: Previous 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011