Wagner Construction, Inc. - Page 45




                                       - 45 -                                         
          the medians for highway and heavy construction companies.  A                
          larger percentage indicates that equity holders receive a higher            
          return, in relation to the book value of their investment in the            
          company.  Petitioner's ratio was -2.4 percent in 1995 and 11.9              
          percent in 1996.  The medians for companies in the four                     
          subcategories with sales between $1 and $10 million were between            
          11.2 and 20.4 percent in 1995 and between 11.1 and 19.1 percent             
          in 1996.                                                                    
               Dr. Lacey's analysis has a fatal flaw; none of the 12                  
          publicly traded companies he selected was reasonably comparable             
          to petitioner.  All of them were much larger than petitioner,               
          particularly in terms of their respective annual sales.  The                
          largest company, FW, had sales of $3.04 billion in 1995 and $4              
          billion in 1996.  The smallest company, GoC, had sales of $12.77            
          million in 1995 and $13.16 million in 1996.  Eight of the                   
          companies had gross receipts in excess of $100 million in 1995              
          and 1996.  Another had gross receipts in excess of $90 million in           
          1995 and $133 million in 1996.  Of the three remaining smaller              
          companies (gross receipts between $12 and $50 million), Dr. Lacey           
          eliminated two companies (GoC and UC) from many of his                      
          calculations because they showed losses in both 1995 and 1996.              
               Dr. Lacey concluded that petitioner's return on equity would           
          not satisfy the expectation of a reasonable investor because the            
          return was below the median and average returns of the publicly             






Page:  Previous  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011