- 72 -                                         
          judicial review of an administrative determination to a judicial            
          trial de novo”), affd. 658 F.2d 735 (10th Cir. 1981).                       
                    e.  Disregard of District Court Cases                             
               The District Courts of the United States have jurisdiction             
          to hear section 6330 appeals involving taxes over which the Tax             
          Court does not have jurisdiction.  Sec. 6330(d)(1)(B).  As far as           
          we can tell, those courts have uniformly limited their review for           
          abuse of discretion in such cases to the administrative record.             
          See Muller v. Rossotti, 93 AFTR 2d 2004-1782, 1786-1787, 2004-1             
          USTC par. 50,239, at 83,495 (M.D. Tenn. 2004) (quoting United               
          States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co., 373 U.S. at 714); Living Care                
          Alternatives, Inc. v. United States, 93 AFTR 2d 2004-761, 764               
          n.2, 2004-1 USTC par. 50,167, at 83,249 n.2 (S.D. Ohio 2003);               
          Hart v. United States, 291 F. Supp. 2d 635, 640 (N.D. Ohio 2003);           
          Cmty. Residential Servs., Inc. v. United States, 91 AFTR 2d 2003-           
          2190, 2190, 2003-1 USTC par. 50,458, at 88,339 (M.D.N.C. 2003)              
          (citing Camp v. Pitts, 411 U.S. at 142-143); Dudley’s Commercial            
          & Indus. Coating, Inc. v. United States, 292 F. Supp. 2d 976, 985           
          (M.D. Tenn. 2003) (citing Camp v. Pitts, supra at 142); Triad               
          Microsys., Inc. v. United States, 90 AFTR 2d 2002-7332, 7334,               
          2003-1 USTC par. 50,106, at 87,030 (E.D. Va. 2002) (citing Camp             
          v. Pitts, supra at 142); Carroll v. United States, 217 F. Supp.             
          2d 852, 858 (W.D. Tenn. 2002) (citing United States v. Carlo                
          Bianchi & Co., supra at 714); Remole v. United States, 89 AFTR 2d           
Page:  Previous   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   NextLast modified: May 25, 2011