- 2 - payment obligation would not end upon the first Mrs. Rogers’ death. Rogers disagrees and says that his obligation to pay would end on her death as a matter of state law.1 Deciding this Federal tax case therefore requires us to closely examine the divorce law of Tennessee, the State where Rogers wed, divorced, remarried, and resided when he filed the petition in this case. Background Rogers’ first wife sued him for divorce in 1991 and quickly moved to get alimony pendente lite. In July 1991, the Tennessee Circuit Court handling her case ordered Rogers to pay $225 per week while the case was pending. The order specifically provided that the “payments are to be made directly from the ABC Insurance Center to the plaintiff. The entire amount paid by ABC Insurance Center shall be taxable income to the defendant.” The estranged couple soon negotiated a Marital Dissolution Agreement, which was adopted by the Circuit Court as part of its final decree granting the divorce in March 1992. The Dissolution Agreement continued Rogers’ weekly obligation: The Husband shall pay as lump sum alimony to the Wife in installments two hundred twenty- five and no/100ths ($225.00) dollars per week, beginning immediately, and continuing 1 Paul Rogers’ second wife, Judy, is a petitioner only because she filed a joint return with him for the 2000 tax year. All references to “Rogers” are to him alone.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011