- 12 - "lump sum alimony." According to him, "lump sum alimony" is a synonym in Tennessee law for alimony in solido. And while Rogers is right that the labels that divorced couples attach to their payments are not determinative, Bowers v. Bowers, 1997 WL 530771 (Tenn. Ct. App., Aug 28, 1997), they are at least evidence of a couple’s intent, Cunningham, T.C. Memo. 1999-474. We also find support in the sentence in the order granting alimony pendente lite that states that the $225/week would be taxable to Rogers. When read together with the description in the Dissolution Agreement of the payments as to be received directly from ABC Insurance Center through the term of the contract, this does look more like an assignment of income from property (i.e., the contract with ABC Insurance Center) that in some way remained Rogers’. This undermines Rogers’ argument that the pendente lite award necessarily indicates the Circuit Court had in mind an award of rehabilitative alimony--to the contrary, it suggests that the trial court in the divorce proceeding viewed the award as a division of property. It is true that the clause stating the payments would be taxable to Rogers is not in the final decree, but even if we infer from the deletion of that language that they were intended to be taxable to his ex-wife, we can still find no clear intent regarding what would happen had she died.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011