Henry M. Lloyd - Page 36




                                       - 36 -                                         
                    Because I have just been retained, I have an open                 
               mind about this case, and will be happy to discuss with                
               you any and all resolutions which you might consider                   
               appropriate, giving due consideration, of course, to                   
               Mr. Lloyd’s advanced age and what I consider to be                     
               limited earning ability.                                               
               On November 14, 2005, at 4:51 p.m., Mr. Kauffman sent                  
          another letter by facsimile to the settlement officer.  In that             
          letter, Mr. Kauffman stated in pertinent part:                              
                              Re: Henry M. Lloyd * * *                                
                                   Henry M. Lloyd, P.C. * * *                         
                  *       *       *       *       *       *       *                   
                    I want to thank you for your prompt reply to the                  
               letter I sent you earlier this morning.  This letter is                
               written to confirm our conversations this afternoon.                   
               Because I have just been retained, let me summarize my                 
               understanding of the status of the above-referenced                    
               matters in the remainder of this letter.  Please re-                   
               spond to this letter only if my summary is incorrect.                  
                    I understand that offers-in-compromise were sub-                  
               mitted for Henry M. Lloyd (“Mr. Lloyd”) and Henry M.                   
               Lloyd, P.C. (the “PC”).  After the PC’s offer was                      
               formally rejected, it filed an appeal.  Sometime in                    
               August of this year, the PC’s appeal was rejected, and                 
               the PC’s delinquency is now back in collection.                        
                    In contrast, Mr. Lloyd’s offer has not yet been                   
               formally rejected; however, I understand that you do                   
               intend to reject it, but not until after we speak on                   
               December 6th.  When you reject Mr. Lloyd’s offer, you                  
               will send a formal written notice of rejection and                     
               appeal rights.  I also understand that * * * [the                      
               second offer specialist] is no longer working the case                 
               at this time.                                                          
                    On December 6th, we will discuss Mr. Lloyd’s                      
               pending request for due process hearing, and potential                 
               alternative approaches to resolving the PC’s and Mr.                   
               Lloyd’s tax delinquencies.                                             








Page:  Previous  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008