Appeal No. 96-1584 Application 08/066,697 In FIG. 9, Piotrowski discloses a semiconductor structure having an NPN transistor having an N/N+ junction intersecting an island insulating layer and a P-type region spaced from the layer. Taylor discloses a semiconductor RAM cell having a common contact region 23 connecting a trench 32 with the N- island region 22. THE REJECTIONS UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 103 In its brief at page 12, appellant indicates that independent claim 23 stands or falls with independent claim 22 and at page 21, appellant indicates that claims 4-6, 8 and 9 stand or fall with the rejection of claim 22, from which they depend, and that claims 13-15, 17 and 18 stand or fall with the rejection of claim 23, upon which they depend. At page 26 of the brief, appellant further indicates that the Board's decision on the patentability of claims 11, 12 and 16, which depend from claim 23, stands or falls with the decision on patentability of claims 2, 3 and 7, respectively, which claims depend from claim 22. Lastly, at page 26 of the brief, appellant indicates that, whereas dependent claims 20 and 21 further delimit claim 24 in the same manner that claims 2 and 3 further delimit claim 22, the 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007