THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
This opinion (1) was not written for publication and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TOSIHIRO FUSAYASU, KENJI KAGATA, HIROTUGU YAMADA,
ISAO KITAMURA, MASANOBU KOHARA, and MITSUYUKI TAKADA
____________
Appeal No. 96-2821
Application 08/015,007
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and FLEMING and
TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges.
TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
FINDINGS OF FACT
We have reviewed the record in its entirety in light of the
arguments of Applicants and the examiner. Our decision presumes
familiarity with the entire record. A preponderance of the
evidence of record supports each of the following fact findings.
A. The nature of the case
1. Applicants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claim 5. (Paper 22.) Claims 1-4 and 6-13 have been
canceled. (Paper 16 at 1.)
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007