Appeal No. 94-3053
Application 07/832,661
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT and FLEMING, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejec-
tion of claims 2 through 17, 20 through 28, 31 through 35, 39,
40, 55, and 60 through 64. Claims 36 through 38, 56 through
59, 65 and 66 stand objected to as depending from a rejected
claim. Claims 41, 46 through 48, 50 and 51 have been
allowed. Appellants state on page 2 of the brief that claims2
1, 18, 19, 29, 30, 32 through 40, 42 through 45, 49, 52
through 54 and 62 through 66 have been cancelled. Therefore,
claims 2 through 17, 20 through 28, 31, 55, 60 and 61 are
properly before us for our consideration.
Appellants’ invention relates to an electronic data
processing device which utilizes a processor and a serial scan
2We note that the summary of action incorrectly states
the status of the final rejection of the claims.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007