Appeal No. 94-3053
Application 07/832,661
sensor connected to said electronic processor . . ." (at col.
2, lines 32-34), "means for recognizing the occurrence of a
pre-determined condition during real time operation of said
electronic processor" (at col. 3, lines 22-26), "means
responsive to the recognition of said predetermined condition
for applying a control input to said electronic processor . .
." (at col. 2, lines 50-61; col. 3, lines 26-37; col. 4, lines
4-7), and “a serial scan circuit connected to said on-chip
condition sensor
. . ." (at col. 2, lines 32-34).
On page 4 of the brief and page 2 of the reply
brief, Appellants only argue that Hester fails to disclose the
following limitations recited in claim 55:
an on-chip condition sensor . . . including
. . . means responsive to the recognition
of said predetermined condition [of the
electronic processor under test] for
applying a control input to said electronic
processor during said real time operation
thereof.
Appellants do not argue in their briefs that the above claim
language should be interpreted any more narrowly than its
10
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007