Appeal No. 94-3053
Application 07/832,661
any such burden, 37 CFR § 1.192, and declines to look beyond
that argued by Appellants in their brief in this case.
Group (3) - representative claim 23
Claim 23 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in
view of Hester and Poret. The extent of Appellants’ argument
for this group is "[t]hese rejections of Claims 23-26 are
traversed for the same reasons given above (in Argument
Section A) with respect to Claim 60." Brief at page 5. Thus,
since Appellants have not
argued anything in addition to that which they argued for
claim 60, the rejection of claim 23 is also sustained for the
reasons set forth above for claim 60. This board declines to
look beyond that which has been argued by Appellants. Baxter,
952 F.2d at 391, 21 USPQ2d at 1285; 37 CFR § 1.192.
Group (4) - representative claim 4
Claim 4 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in
view of Hester and Zaks. The extent of Appellants’ argument
17
Page: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007