Appeal No. 94-3053
Application 07/832,661
for this group is "[t]hese rejections of Claims 4-5 and 16 are
traversed for the same reasons given above (in Argument
Section A) with respect to Claim 55." Brief at page 6. Thus,
since Appellants have not argued anything in addition to that
which they argued for claim 55, the rejection of claim 4 is
also sustained for the reasons set forth above for claim 55.
Again, this board declines to look beyond that which has been
argued by Appellants. Baxter, 952 F.2d at 391, 21 USPQ2d at
1285; 37 CFR § 1.192.
Group (5) - representative claim 6
Claim 6 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in
view of Hester and d’Angeac. Appellants argue that this
rejection should be reversed because this claim recites that
"said on-chip condition sensor includes . . . sensor circuit
selection circuitry," and neither Hester nor D’Angeac
discloses this particular feature. Brief at page 6.
18
Page: Previous 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007