Appeal No. 94-3053
Application 07/832,661
by Appellants with the necessary reasons to combine it
with the support processor of Hester. Therefore, we will not
sustain this rejection.
Claim 3
Claim 3 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in
view of Hester and Poret. On page 5 of the brief, Appellants
set forth the only argument for this claim as follows: "[t]his
rejection of Claim 3 is traversed for the same reasons given
above (in Argument Section A) with respect to Claim 55."
Thus,
Appellants have not argued anything in addition to that which
they argued for claim 55. Therefore, we will sustain the
rejection of claim 3 for the reasons set forth above for claim
55.
This board declines to look beyond that which has been argued
by Appellants. Baxter, 952 F.2d at 391, 21 USPQ2d at 1285; 37
CFR
§ 1.192.
20
Page: Previous 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007