Appeal No. 94-3053
Application 07/832,661
through 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Hester, d’Angeac and Poret; and claims 28 and 31 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Hester and Poret.
Therefore, claims 2, 11 through 15, 17 and 55 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being unpatentable over
Hester. Claims 20 through 22, 28, 31, 60 and 61 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Hester. Claims 3, 23 through 26, 28 and 31 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Hester and
Poret. Claims 4, 5 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over Hester and Zaks. Claims 6
through 10 and 27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Hester and d’Angeac. Claims 8 through
10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Hester, d’Angeac and Poret.
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007