THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte BRIAN K. HERBERT
_______________
Appeal No. 95-4815
Application 08/065,3871
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, KRASS, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1 through 9, all of the claims pending in the
application.
The invention pertains to step addressing in a video RAM.
More particularly, data words intended for consecutive address
locations are intercepted and distributed into video RAM at
evenly spaced, non-consecutive addresses so that when a
1 Application for patent filed May 20, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007