Ex parte HERBERT - Page 2



         Appeal No. 95-4815                                                        
         Application No. 08/065,387                                                

         graphics controller generates pixels on a display, based on               
         these evenly spaced addresses, the pixels will automatically              
         occupy a vertical                                                         
         column on the display.  Thus, the invention permits CPU                   
         addressing of data in rows (consecutively) and subsequent                 
         writing to video RAM in columns (non-consecutively) with an               
         intermediate graphics controller performing the translation               
         from consecutive to non-consecutive addresses, which saves CPU            
         processing time.                                                          
              Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced as                  
         follows:                                                                  
              1.  A method of copying data to video RAM in a computer,             
                 comprising the following steps:                                   
                   (a)  ordering a processor to copy a consecutive data            
                     field to consecutive addresses in video RAM; and              
                   (b)   receiving the consecutive data field from the             
                     processor, and distributing it to non-consecutive             
                     addresses in video RAM.                                       
              The examiner relies on the following references:                     
         Maruko              4,613,852          Sep. 23, 1986                      
         Diepstraten et al. 5,231,383           Jul. 27, 1993                      
         (Diepstraten)                 (filed Mar. 25, 1991)                       
              Claims 1 through 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. ' 103.             
         As evidence of obviousness, the examiner cites Diepstraten                
         with regard to claims 1 through 3, 8 and 9, adding Maruko with            
         regard to claims 4 through 7.                                             


                                         2                                         



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007