Appeal No. 95-4815
Application No. 08/065,387
Therefore, while we sustain the rejection of claim 8
under 35 U.S.C. ' 103, we will not sustain the rejection of
claim 9 under 35 U.S.C. ' 103.
We have sustained the rejection of claims 2 and 8 under
35 U.S.C. ' 103 but we have not sustained the rejection of
claims 1, 3 through 7 and 9 under 35 U.S.C. ' 103.
Accordingly, the examiner’s decision is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
' 1.136 (a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
James D. Thomas )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
Errol A. Krass ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
Richard Torczon )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Wayne P. Bailey
Symbios Logic Inc.
2001 Danfield Court, Mail Stop E
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007