Appeal No. 97-1037 Application 08/467,869 The following rejections are before us for review. Claims 1 through 3, and 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Niwa in view of the British document. Claims 1 through 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the PCT document in view of Niwa. The full text of the examiner's rejections and response to the argument presented by appellant appears in the answer (Paper No. 21), while the complete statement of appellant’s argument can be found in the main and reply briefs (Paper Nos. 20, 22 and 25). In the main brief (page 4), appellant indicates that claims 1, 2, and 4 may be considered together, while claims 3 and 5 are not to be considered with claims 1, 2, and 4. Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7), we select claims 1 and 5 for review from appellant’s respective groupings of claims. Accordingly, based upon our selection of claims 1 and 5 and appellant’s stated claim groupings, as to the rejection of claims 1 through 3 and 5, 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007