Ex parte JOSEFSSON - Page 3




          Appeal No. 97-1037                                                          
          Application 08/467,869                                                      



                    The following rejections are before us for review.                
                    Claims 1 through 3, and 5 stand rejected under                    
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Niwa in view of the              
          British document.                                                           


                    Claims 1 through 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103           
          as being unpatentable over the PCT document in view of Niwa.                


                    The full text of the examiner's rejections and response           
          to the argument presented by appellant appears in the answer                
          (Paper No. 21), while the complete statement of appellant’s                 
          argument can be found in the main and reply briefs (Paper                   
          Nos. 20, 22 and 25).                                                        


                    In the main brief (page 4), appellant indicates that              
          claims 1, 2, and 4 may be considered together, while claims 3               
          and 5 are not to be considered with claims 1, 2, and 4.  Pursuant           
          to 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7), we select claims 1 and 5 for review from           
          appellant’s respective groupings of claims.  Accordingly, based             
          upon our selection of claims 1 and 5 and appellant’s stated claim           
          groupings, as to the rejection of claims 1 through 3 and 5,                 


                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007