Appeal No. 97-1037 Application 08/467,869 The minimum values similarly call for an intermediate layer 2 and film 3 thinner than each metal sheet. Of particular interest, is the clear indication by Niwa (column 6, lines 40 through 45) of a conventional form of damper wherein a sheet form of rubber is interposed between steel sheets with the use of polyethylene resin. The British document (page 2, lines 13 through 26) teaches a vibration damping device having rubber material vulcanized to and sandwiched between metal plates. The document expressly indicates (page 2, lines 27 through 31) that the thickness of the mixture of rubber and extract between the two relatively rigid structures may be determined by the man skilled in the art depending on the par- ticular purpose for which the device is to be used, and the known principles governing the constructions of vibration damping devices of this type. In applying the test for obviousness, we reach the 6 conclusion that it would have been obvious to one having ordinary 6The test for obviousness is what the combined teachings of references would have suggested to one of ordinary skill in the art. See In re Young, 927 F.2d 588, 591, 18 USPQ2d 1089, 1091 (Fed. Cir. 1991) and In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 425, 208 USPQ 871, 881 (CCPA 1981). 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007