Appeal No. 97-1156
Application 08/192,270
Claims 30 through 32 and 37 through 48, as best
understood, stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being
anticipated by Ito ‘704.
The full text of the examiner's rejections and response
to the argument presented by appellants can be found in the
main and supplemental answers (Paper Nos. 20 and 22) , while3
the complete statement of appellants’ argument can be found in
the main and reply briefs (Paper Nos. 19 and 21).
OPINION
In reaching our conclusion on the issues raised in this
appeal, this panel of the board has carefully considered
We are informed by Paper No. 19 (page 5) and Paper No. 20 (page 3) as3
to an appeal in application Serial No. 07/987,186, the parent application of
the present divisional application before us.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007