ROBERGE V. STAPLES - Page 2




          Interference No. 103,345                                                    


                                      JUDGMENT                                        
                    The subject matter of this interference is an                     
          orthodontic device for expanding the palate.  Count 1, the                  
          sole count, reads as follows:                                               
                         An orthodontia palatal expander apparatus for                
                    causing the widening of a patient's palate                        
                    comprising:                                                       
                         an expansion screw assembly which includes:                  
                         a threaded member having a longitudinal axis;                
                         two bodies meshed with said threaded member,                 
          said      bodies being movable in opposite directions along                 
                    said threaded member upon rotation of said threaded               
                    member;                                                           
                         first and second means for transferring pressure             
                    to side regions of a patient's palate, said first                 
                    transferring means joined to one body and said                    
                    second transferring means joined to the other body;               
                         the improvement comprising:                                  
                         gear means operatively connected to said                     
          threaded       member for enabling selective manual rotation                
                         thereof, said gear means including a first gear              
                         fixed to said threaded member and a second gear              
                         mounted in driving relationship with the first               
                         gear, said second gear including means for                   
                         enabling manual rotation thereof.                            
          The following claims correspond to the count:                               
                    Roberge claims 1-8.                                               
                    Staples claims 1-23.                                              

                                          - 2 -                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007