Interference No. 103,345
comply with the provisions of 37 CFR § 1.671(f) and Rules 8026
and 901(a) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which apply to
interferences pursuant to § 1.671(b). As authorized by7
§ 1.672(c), Staples responded with supplemental affidavits by
Jeffrey Staples and Les Hetrick, referencing new exhibits I-
K, of which J and K are identical to exhibits E and G,8
respectively. Roberge elected not to cross-examine any of the
Staples witnesses.
On February 16, 1996, just prior to the February 17
9 10
due date for the parties' records, Staples filed a record
consisting of the initial affidavits by Lambert and Smith, the
This provision reads: "(f) The significance of documentary6
and other exhibits identified by a witness in an affidavit or
during oral deposition shall be discussed with particularity by a
witness."
This provision reads: "(b) Except as otherwise provided in7
this subpart, the Federal Rules of Evidence shall apply to
interference proceedings. Those portions of the Federal Rules of
Evidence relating to criminal actions, juries, and other matters
not relevant to interferences shall not apply."
Paper No. 23, filed December 20, 1995.8
See paper Nos. 10 and 16.9
Paper No. 26.10
- 4 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007