THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte YOSHITSUGU MORITA,
JUNJI NAKANISHI, KEN TANAKA
and TOSHIO SARUYAMA
_____________
Appeal No. 96-0613
Application 08/226,5391
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before GARRIS, JOHN D. SMITH, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 7 through 14 and 18
1Application for patent filed April 12, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007