Appeal No. 96-0613
Application No. 08/226,539
Griswold. Additionally, the examiner has not established why
one of ordinary skill in the art would have been led or
motivated to use the process of JPA ‘655 in place of the well
known hydrosilation addition reaction taught by Griswold
(column 6, lines 39-42).
For the foregoing reasons, we find no reason or
suggestion to modify the references in the manner proposed by
the examiner.
Accordingly, the examiner’s rejection of claims 18 through 27
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over JPA ‘942 in view of
Griswold and JPA ‘655 is reversed.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007