Ex parte HIGUCHI et al. - Page 6




          Appeal No. 1996-2195                                                        
          Application 08/120,911                                                      



          Inc., 721 F.2d 1540, 1548, 220 USPQ 303, 309 (Fed. Cir. 1983),              
          cert. denied, 469 U.S. 851 (1984).                                          
                    Appellants argue on page 11 of the brief that                     
          Watkins' CPU can only use a central cache with respect to                   
          either reading or writing data, but cannot use the I/O cache.               
          Appellants point out that Watkins' CPU uses the I/O cache only              
          for specific pur-poses including executing the flush cycle,                 
          pointing to column 21, line 66, to column 22, line 14.                      
          Appellants point out that the use of the central cache and the              
          I/O cache by the CPU results from the basic concept of                      
          operation disclosed by Watkins wherein the I/O cache is used                
          for holding data which has been written from outside the                    
          processor by each I/O device that is to be written into the                 
          system memory.                                                              
                    Appellants argue that their invention operates                    
          differently in that the processor of their invention has a                  
          main cache and a receive cache wherein the instruction                      
          processor uses                                                              




                                          6                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007