Appeal No. 1996-2369 Page 14
Application No. 08/191,723
detecting for logically converting the address so as to
prevent the occurrence of the undesired display at an
addressable position within the maximum effective display
space of the display means.” (Examiner’s Answer at 4.)
The cited passage of the specification, however, merely
teaches that “address data not within the scope of effective
address are discriminated ... so that no undesired display can
occur within the effective display space.” (Spec. at 4.)
Neither the production of extended address data or the use of
the extended address data to convert address data is disclosed
therein. There is no disclosure of therein. Consequently,
the passage neither teaches nor would have suggested the
hardware conversion means and logic circuit means as claimed.
For the foregoing reasons, the examiner has not
established a prima facie case of obviousness. Therefore, we
reverse the rejection of claims 1, 3, and 5-8.
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007