THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SHADI L. MALHOTRA
____________
Appeal No. 96-3946
Application No. 08/208,3171
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 32, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.
The appellant's invention relates to a printing process
of ejecting an aqueous ink onto a recording sheet which
1Application for patent filed March 10, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007