Ex parte MALHOTRA - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-3946                                                          
          Application No. 08/208,317                                                  


          includes a substrate and two coating layers, each coating                   
          layer being formed of a binder and microspheres.  Claim 1 is                
          illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as                      
          follows:                                                                    
               1.   A printing process which comprises the steps of                   
               (a) incorporating into an ink jet printing apparatus                   
               containing an aqueous ink a recording sheet which                      
               consists essentially of (1) a substrate; (2) a first                   
               coating layer which comprises a binder and                             
               microspheres having an average particle diameter of                    
               at least about 1 micron; (3) a second, ink-receiving                   
               coating layer situated so that the first coating                       
               layer is between the second, ink-receiving coating                     
               layer and the substrate, said second, ink-receiving                    
               layer comprising a hydrophilic binder and                              
               microspheres having an average particle diameter of                    
               at least about 1 micron; (4) an optional antistatic                    
               agent; (5) an optional biocide; and (6) an optional                    
               filler; and (b) causing droplets of the ink to be                      
               ejected in an imagewise pattern onto a surface of                      
               the recording sheet containing microspheres, thereby                   
               generating images on the recording sheet.                              
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Miyamoto et al. (Miyamoto)    4,460,637           Jul. 17, 1984             
          Ayers et al. (Ayers)          4,575,729           Mar. 11, 1986             
          Vieira et al. (Vieira)        5,073,448           Dec. 17, 1991             
               Claims 1 to 32 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,                   
          second paragraph as being vague and indefinite.                             



                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007