THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte NOBUAKI MOTOYAMA and SOUICHI KOBAYASHI
____________
Appeal No. 97-1246
Application No. 08/196,7311
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KRASS, MARTIN, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from a patent examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 7
and 10. Claims 8 and 9 were objected to as dependent on a
rejected claim.
We REVERSE.
1Application for patent filed February 15, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007