Appeal No. 97-1246 Page 5
Application No. 08/196,731
information indicating whether an object to be accessed
is an instruction or data,
information indicating whether said memory management
unit accesses said address translation table or not for
translating a read access address, and information indicating
whether said memory management unit accesses an address
translation table or not for translating a write access
address, in said status register, and
said register holds said error signal and information
held in said status register, when said error detecting means
detects an error.
The prior art reference of record relied upon by the
examiner in rejecting the appealed claims follows:
Amini et al. (Amini) 5,313,627 May 17, 1994
(filed January 2, 1992).
Claims 1-7 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Amini. Rather than repeat the
arguments of the appellants or examiner, we refer to the
briefs and examiner’s answer for the respective details
thereof.
OPINION
In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have
considered the subject matter on appeal, the rejection
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007