THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte MARTIN COLE, THOMAS T. HOWARTH
and CHRISTOPHER READING
________________
Appeal No. 98-1591
Application 08/417,6251
________________
HEARD: MAY 3, 1999
________________
Before GARRIS, OWENS and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed April 6, 1995. According
to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/749,482, filed August 15, 1991, which is a
continuation of Application 07/210,339, filed June 23, 1988,
now abandoned, which is a continuation is Application
05/569,007, filed April 17, 1975, now abandoned.
-1-1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007