Ex parte COLE et al. - Page 2




             Appeal No. 98-1591                                                                                   
             Application 08/417,625                                                                               


                    This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of                                      
             claims 36-45, which are all of the claims remaining in the                                           
             application.                                                                                         
                                                THE INVENTION                                                     
                    Appellants’ claimed invention is directed toward                                              
             clavulanic acid and specified salts thereof.  Appellants state                                       
             that these compounds enhance the effectiveness of $-lactam                                           
             antibiotics against many $-lactamase producing bacteria                                              
             (specification, page 1, lines 5-7).  Claim 42 is illustrative                                        
             and reads as follows:                                                                                
                    42.  Clavulanic acid.                                                                         
                                                THE REFERENCE                                                     
             Eli Lilly & Co. (Lilly)        1,315,177         Apr. 26, 1973                                       
                                               THE REJECTIONS                                                     
                    Claims 36, 37 and 41-45 stand provisionally rejected                                          
             under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type                                            
             double patenting over claims 35 and 36 of copending                                                  
             Application 08/417,628 and over claims 36-42 of copending                                            
             Application                                                                                          
             08/418,055.  Claims 36-45 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                                       


                                                       -2-2                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007