MORRISON et al. V. MANNHEIMER et al. - Page 63




          Interference No. 103,197                                                      


          failed to constitute an actual reduction to practice even if                  
          the test apparatus represented an embodiment of a complete and                
          operative probe as it would be thereafter applied in practice.                
          Because the November 1987 designs employ optical fibers in                    
          needles (coiled needles at that) to deliver light to the                      
          tissue site, those designs also would deliver insufficient                    
          light to the tissue site and thus are ineffective as evidence                 
          of conception.                                                                
                    (c) Motion artifacts due to needle movement                         
               According to Falkowski, the only explanation possible for                
          obtaining apparently valid pulse rate and oxygen saturation                   
          readings with the February test apparatus is that  99                         
               all of the light going through the fibers has been                       
               modulated by motion artifacts and thus became AC of the                  
               Morrison experiment.  The corresponding DC is the shunt                  
               light traveling from one drop of glue to the other drop                  
               of glue.  Thus, he [Morrison] encountered a modulation                   
               depth of about 1% to 2% which is a normal modulation                     
               depth for a commercial pulse oximeter, if the waveform                   
               happens to look like a pulse.                                            
          Falkowski then explained how this must have happened:  100                    
               Experimentally, we found that [when] keeping the two                     
               hypodermic needles perpendicular to the skin, as Dr.                     

            BR 26, ¶ e.99                                                                       
            BR 26, ¶ f.100                                                                      
                                        - 60 -                                          





Page:  Previous  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007