The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication and is not
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 60
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte TAKASHI HOTTA, SHIGEYA TANAKA and HIDEO MAEJIMA
________________
Appeal No. 2000-1356
Application 07/979,772
________________
HEARD: OCTOBER 26, 2000
________________
Before FLEMING, RUGGIERO and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the final rejection of all the pending claims 38, 40 to1
64, 91, 92, 120 to 146, 173, 174, and 181 to 184.
1There was an amendment after the final rejection [paper
no. 43] which was entered by the Examiner [paper no. 46].
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007