Appeal No. 2000-1356
Application 07/979,772
do not sustain the obviousness rejection over Lee of
independent claims 120, 130, 138, 173 and 174, and their
dependent claims 121 through 129 and 183, 131 through 137, 139
through 146, and 184.
In summary, we have sustained the obviousness rejection
over Lee of claims 38, 40 to 64, 91, 92, 181 and 182, but not
of claims 120 to 146, 173, 174, 183 and 184.
Accordingly, the decision of the Examiner rejecting
claims 38, 40 to 64, 91, 92, 120 to 146, 173, 174, and 181 to
184 is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
-13-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007