Interference 102,760
37 CFR §1.633(a) or 37 CFR §1.635 (Paper No. 52)(1) arguing
that claims in Dement et al. Application 07/695,325 are
unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 102(f), and (2) requesting
authorization to take testimony of each joint inventor of
Dement et al. on his contribution to inventorship.
June 24, 1993 -- Judge Sofocleous deferred Rapoport’s
motions filed June 1, 1993, to final hearing (Paper No. 56).
July 9, 1993 -- Rapoport filed a Second Motion To Accept
Belated Filing Of Preliminary Motion Under 37 CFR
1.633(a)(Paper No. 63).
July 9, 1993 -- Rapoport filed a Motion For Judgment
Under 37 CFR 1.633(a)(Paper No. 64) arguing that claims in
Dement et al. Application 07/695,325 are unpatentable under 35
U.S.C.
§ 102(g)/103.
July 21, 1993 -- On reconsideration, Rapoport’s request
to modify Judge Sofocleous’ June 24, 1993, decision to defer
the motions Rapoport filed June 1, 1993, to final hearing, was
denied by a three-judge panel (Paper No. 66).
August 4, 1994 -- Dement et al. filed (1) a Motion To
Suppress Testimony of David M. Rapoport And Contingent Motion
To Suppress Rapoport Exhibits 4, 5, 6, 10 and 11 Under 37 CFR
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007