Interference 102,760
required oath, except as otherwise provided in this
title.
Inventors may apply for a patent jointly even though
(1) they did not physically work together or at the same
time, (2) each did not make the same type or amount of
contribution, or (3) each did not make a contribution to
the subject matter of every claim of the patent.
Accordingly, even if the evidence shows that the full scope of
the invention defined by every one of Claims 1-13 of
Application 07/695,325 is not the joint invention of Dement,
Rosekind and Schwimmer, Rapoport has not thereby established
that Dement, Rosekind and Schwimmer are not properly named as
joint inventors of subject matter claimed in Application
07/695,325 under
35 U.S.C. § 116. Thus, it follows that even if the evidence
shows that Dement, Rosekind and Schwimmer did not jointly
conceive of the full scope of the invention defined by every
one of Claims 1-13 of Application 07/695,325, Rapoport has not
thereby established that Dement, Rosekind and Schwimmer are
not properly named as joint inventors of subject matter
claimed in Application 07/695,325 under 35 U.S.C. § 116.
Therefore, even if the evidence to which Rapoport points shows
that Dement, Rosekind and Schwimmer did not jointly conceive
of the full scope of the invention defined by every one of
Claims 1-13 of Application 07/695,325, Rapoport has not
15
Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007