Interference 102,760 defined by those claims was first reduced to practice was August 10, 1989" (Supplemental Record of the Party Rapoport (SRR) (Paper No. 147), Copies of Written Interrogatories And Answers Thereto Being Introduced Into Evidence (WIA), Response To Interrogatory No. 1 (RI 1), p. 257). B. “As to claim 8 of application Serial No. 07/695,525 [sic, 07/695,325], the inventive entity comprises . . . Schwimmer. The date that the conception of invention defined by this claim was complete was the first half of 1989. . . . The date the invention defined by this claim was first reduced to practice was February 12, 1990" (SRR, WIA, RI 1, p. 257). C. “As to claims 3-5 and 9-12 of application Serial No. 07/695,325, the inventive entity comprises . . . Schwimmer. The Date that the conception of the invention defined by those claims was complete was prior to February 12, 1990. . . . The date the invention defined by those claims was first reduced to practice was February 12, 1990" (SRR, WIA, RI 1, p. 257). D. “For all claims in which . . . Dement is identified as an inventor in response to Interrogatory No. 1 [(RI 1)], his contribution to the conception of the invention was his concept, as disclosed to Wesley Seidel prior to April 1986, of 11Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007