Interference 102,760
A. Dismissed Motions To Suppress
On August 4, 1994, Dement et al. filed (1) a Motion To
Suppress Testimony of David M. Rapoport And Contingent Motion
To Suppress Rapoport Exhibits 4, 5, 6, 10 And 11 Under 37
C.F.R. §1.635 And §1.656(h)(Paper No. 101), (2) a Motion To
Suppress Rapoport Exhibits 10 and 11 Under 37 C.F.R. §1.635
And §1.656(h) (Paper No. 101), and (3) a Motion To Suppress
Documentary Evidence Under 37 C.F.R. §1.635 And
§1.656(h)(Paper No. 101). The Board considered Rapoport
Exhibits 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 26, 37, 41 and 42 in its Decision
mailed April 12, 1996 (Paper No. 112, p. 11, l. 3 (RX 42),
p. 11, first full para. (RX 10 & 11);
pp. 11-12, bridging para. (RX 10 & 11); p. 12, first full
para. (RX 10 & 11); p. 14 (RR 193-198, i.e., RX 37); p. 15, l.
2-3
(RR 145-146, i.e., RX 26); p. 16, first full para. (Document
32, i.e., RR 207/RX 41)). In footnote 3 on page 11 of its
Decision mailed April 12, 1996 (Paper No. 112), the Board
dismissed the motions as moot:
Dement et al. have filed two motions to suppress
testimony
and certain evidence relied upon by Rapoport. The
motions
34
Page: Previous 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007