Interference 102,760
claims are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 102(g)/103 was
DISMISSED by Decision mailed April 12, 1996 (Paper No. 112)
and Reconsideration mailed September 6, 1996 (Paper No. 122).
E. Rapoport’s deferred Motion For Judgement Under 37
CFR §1.633(a) or 37 CFR §1.635 filed June 1, 1993 (Paper No.
52), arguing that Dement et al. claims are unpatentable under
35 U.S.C. § 102(f), is hereby DENIED.
The Board’s prior Decision mailed April 12, 1996 (Paper
No. 112) and Reconsideration mailed September 6, 1996 (Paper
No. 122), including its judgement as to the patentability of
claims in Dement et al. Application 07/695,325 and award of
priority of the invention of Count 1 of Interference 102,760,
are hereby incorporated by reference and included in the
attached Appendix. We do not review the prior decisions of
the Board.
8. Final Disposition
For Interference 102,760, it is
ORDERED that judgement on priority as to the Count 1, the
sole count in this interference, is awarded against junior
party
DAVID M. RAPOPORT;
39
Page: Previous 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007