Interference 102,760
identified and their significance was discussed with
particularity by the parties in Rapoport’s written
interrogatories and requests for production of documents and
the comments and submissions of party Dement et al. in
response thereto (e.g., see Copies of Written interrogatories
and Answers Thereto Being Introduced Into Evidence (RR 060-
077)) and Rapoport’s motion. Accordingly, party Dement et al.
has not shown that it has been prejudiced by the Board’s
consideration of any of the criticized exhibits and/or
documentary evidence or burdened by any considerable
difficulty in presenting and evaluating the evidence relevant
to the issues presented by this interference, the apparent
focus of 37 CFR §1.671(f)(Motion To Suppress Documentary
Evidence Under 37 C.F.R. §1.635 And §1.656(h)(Paper No. 101),
p. 2, Full Statement of the Reasons Why the Relief Requested
Should be Granted).
B. Motion To Strike Portions Of Rapoport Brief
Dement et al. filed a Motion To Strike Portions Of
Rapoport Brief (Paper No. 148) on February 20, 1998. Judge
Sofocleous deferred consideration of the motion to final
hearing (Paper
No. 153).
36
Page: Previous 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007