THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 56
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SHIGEO MORIMOTO, TAKASHI ADACHI, TOHRU MATSUNAGA,
MASATO KASHIMURA, YOSHIAKI WATANABE and KAORU SOTA
____________
Appeal No. 1996-1080
Application No. 07/869,111
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1 through 3 as amended
subsequent to the final rejection (see the amendment dated
Aug. 12, 1994, Paper No. 48, entered as per the Advisory
Action dated Sep. 2, 1994, Paper No. 49). Claims 1 through 3
are the only claims pending in this application.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007