Ex Parte TARGOFF et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1996-1281                                                                                     
              Application 07/945,295                                                                                   


              follows:                                                                                                 
                     11.   An isolated protein comprising a sequence of amino acids that includes all                  
              or a portion of the sequence of amino acids of the human Mi-2 antigen, wherein said                      
              portion includes at least one epitope of said antigen, and said protein is isolated by                   
              specific immunoreaction with an autoantibody present in human sera, which is                             
              immunoreactive with the human Mi-2 protein having the amino acid sequence set forth                      
              in Sequence ID No. 2.                                                                                    
                     26.   An isolated protein comprising a sequence of amino acids that includes all                  
              or portion of the sequence of amino acids of PM-Scl antigen, wherein said portion                        
              includes at least one epitope of said antigen, and said protein is isolated by specific                  
              immunoreaction with an autoantibody present in human sera, which is immunoreactive                       
              with the human PM-Scl protein having the amino acid sequence set forth in Sequence                       
              ID No. 4.                                                                                                
                     The reference relied upon by the examiner is:                                                     
              Targoff et al. (Targoff), "The Association between Mi-2 Antibodies and                                   
              Dermatomyositis," Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 78 (7), pgs. 796-802 (1985).                            
                                                Grounds of rejection                                                   
                     Claims 11 - 15 and 26  stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph,                    
              as failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the invention.                                 
                     Claims 11-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) or, alternatively, under 35                  
              U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of anticipation/obviousness, the examiner relies on Targoff.                  
                     We reverse the rejection of the claims under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph                    
              and vacate the rejection made alternatively under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) or 35 U.S.C.                        
              § 103.                                                                                                   
                                                    Background                                                         
                     The invention, as presently claimed, is described at pages 1, 2, and 7 of the                     
                                                          2                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007