THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 38
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MANJIT S. CHOPRA and MICHAEL D. VICK
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-0569
Application 08/150,559
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before FRANKFORT, MCQUADE and NASE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 3, 5 through 7, 9, 11 through 13, 15,
and 17 through 22, which are all of the claims remaining in
the application. Claims 2, 4, 8, 10, 14 and 16 have been
canceled.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007