Ex parte PLANKENHORN et al. - Page 1




                                THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                        

                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
                                                    not binding precedent of the Board.                                             
                                                                                                         Paper No. 27               
                                   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        
                                                           ____________                                                             
                                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                         
                                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                           ____________                                                             
                                  Ex parte HORST PLANKENHORN and THOMAS LINDNER                                                     
                                                           ____________                                                             
                                                       Appeal No. 1997-2016                                                         
                                                    Application No. 08/196,126                                                      
                                                           ____________                                                             
                                                             ON BRIEF1                                                              
                                                           ____________                                                             
               Before ABRAMS, McQUADE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                       
               BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                   




                                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             
                       This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 9-16, which                       
               are all of the claims pending in this application.                                                                   






                       1An oral hearing, requested in Paper No. 21 and scheduled for May 17, 2000, was waived (Paper No. 26).       
               Accordingly, this appeal is decided on brief.                                                                        





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007