The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DANNY R. CLINE ____________ Appeal No. 1997-2247 Application No. 08/259,798 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the rejection of claims 1-12. We affirm-in-part. BACKGROUND The invention at issue in this appeal relates to stress testing an integrated circuit (IC) memory. Stress testing is commonly used to learn when an IC memory is expected to fail prematurely during normal use. Because only a few of tens ofPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007