Appeal No. 1997-3691 Page 10
Application No. 08/298,018
Accordingly, the rejection of claim 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. As claims 10 and 11 depend
from claim 6, the rejection of claims 10 and 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. As claim 12
depends from claim 6 and the references to Jin and Thomas, additionally relied upon by the examiner,
do not overcome the deficiencies of Feist, Osinski, Rodder and Sitaram, the rejection of claim 12 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. As claim 13 depends from claim 12 and the reference to Huang,
additionally relied upon by the examiner, does not overcome the deficiencies of Feist, Osinski, Rodder,
Sitaram, Jin and Thomas, the rejection of claim 13 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
CONCLUSION
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007