Appeal No. 1998-2372 Page 13
Application No. 08/639,815
characteristics different from the timekeeping DC pulse. A
time correction output 38 is provided and is tailored to the
characteristics of this DC signal so that the signal is
conveyed from output 38 to the feather switch 35." Col. 3, l.
65, - col. 4, l. 3.
Because Van Orsdel teaches a vehicle providing update
information, we affirm the rejection of claim 4 as obvious
over DeLuca in view of Van Orsdel. Our affirmance is based
only on the arguments made in the brief. Arguments not made
therein are not before us, are not at issue, and are
considered waived.
CONCLUSION
In summary, the rejection of claims 1, 2, 8-11, and 14
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over DeLuca in view of Van
Orsdel is reversed. The rejection of claim 4 under § 103 as
obvious over DeLuca in view of Van Orsdel, however, is
affirmed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007