Appeal No. 1998-2987 Page 9
Application No. 08/250,332
and 33 as obvious over Yamaha in view of Thomas and Gardner,
further in view of Wolf and Hoffman; the rejection of claims
25 and 34 under as obvious over Yamaha in view of Thomas and
Gardner, further in view of Wolf and Hoffman, and further in
view of Howard; the rejection of claims 27 and 35 as obvious
over Yamaha in view of Thomas and Gardner, further in view of
Wolf and Hoffman, and further in view of Chen or Ho; and the
rejection of claim 32 as obvious over Yamaha in view of Thomas
and Gardner, further in view of Wolf and Hoffman, and further
in view of Inoue or Mori.
CONCLUSION
In summary, the rejection of claims 22 and 33 under 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Yamaha in view of Thomas and
Gardner, further in view of Wolf and Hoffman, is reversed.
The rejection of claims 25 and 34 under § 103(a) as obvious
over Yamaha in view of Thomas and Gardner, further in view of
Wolf and Hoffman, and further in view of Howard, is also
reversed. In addition, the rejection of claims 27 and 35
under § 103(a) as obvious over Yamaha in view of Thomas and
Gardner, further in view of Wolf and Hoffman, and further in
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007