Ex parte KULAKOWSKI et al. - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                   publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.             

                                                            Paper No. 19              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                            Ex parte JOHN E. KULAKOWSKI                               
                                        and                                           
                                  RODNEY J. MEANS                                     
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1999-0162                                  
                             Application No. 08/414,248                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before RUGGIERO, BLANKENSHIP, and KRASS, Administrative Patent              
          Judges.                                                                     
          RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection              
          of claims 16-20 and 24-45.  Claims 1-15 and 21-23 were                      
          canceled earlier in the prosecution and claims 46-48 were                   
          withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-                    
          elected invention.  An amendment after final rejection filed                
          July 3, 1997, which canceled claims 16-20, 24, 25, and 46-48,               






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007