The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 19 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte JOHN E. KULAKOWSKI and RODNEY J. MEANS _____________ Appeal No. 1999-0162 Application No. 08/414,248 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before RUGGIERO, BLANKENSHIP, and KRASS, Administrative Patent Judges. RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of claims 16-20 and 24-45. Claims 1-15 and 21-23 were canceled earlier in the prosecution and claims 46-48 were withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non- elected invention. An amendment after final rejection filed July 3, 1997, which canceled claims 16-20, 24, 25, and 46-48,Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007